*Leaders would Rather Fail with Honor

The Unmeasured Metric: Why Honor Outlives Profit

At a recent roundtable, I watched a CEO eviscerate his manager:
“I know you tried your best. But your best wasn’t good enough—it bore no fruit.”
His careful phrasing and coiled posture betrayed contempt. Beneath the words lay an indictment: You failed to deliver profits, even if it required cutting corners. Your integrity is worthless without revenue.

This moment crystallizes a modern leadership crisis.

We claim to revere leaders who weather storms and scale summits—yet we discard them when they stumble honorably. Why do we applaud "discernible outcomes" but ignore the moral infrastructure required to achieve them? Why, in an era obsessed with ostentatious gains, has truthfulness become optional?

I understand that leaders must create economic value. But pragmatism reveals a harder truth: The straight path doesn’t always lead to profit. Sometimes markets shift. Sometimes ethics constrain. Sometimes luck evaporates.

Yet in these moments—when spreadsheets bleed red—we glimpse a leader’s soul.

Do they double down on integrity? Or chase success through deception?
Do they dissect failures with humility? Or scapegoat subordinates?

The ancient Greeks understood what we’ve forgotten. As Sophocles warned:

“Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.”


A leader’s legacy isn’t built on quarterly earnings alone, but on the priceless currency of character:

·         The uprightness to admit “This was my responsibility”

·         The humility to mine wisdom from wreckage

·         The honor that turns defeat into dignity

The CEO I witnessed saw a manager’s “fruitlessness.”
I saw a leader who deserved something rarer than applause:
Respect for refusing to sell his soul.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Becoming Victims of a Single Fictional Narrative (part 2)

Wāyba (Tis) Revitalizing Massage: The Traditional Ethiopian Style

Menelik II and the Devil’s Device: A Tale of Innovation and Resistance