*Leaders would Rather Fail with Honor
The Unmeasured Metric: Why Honor Outlives
Profit
At a recent roundtable, I watched a CEO
eviscerate his manager:
“I know you tried your best. But your best wasn’t good enough—it bore no
fruit.”
His careful phrasing and coiled posture betrayed contempt. Beneath the words
lay an indictment: You failed to deliver profits, even if it required
cutting corners. Your integrity is worthless without revenue.
This moment crystallizes a modern leadership
crisis.
We claim to revere leaders who weather storms
and scale summits—yet we discard them when they stumble honorably. Why do we
applaud "discernible outcomes" but ignore the moral
infrastructure required to achieve them? Why, in an era obsessed with
ostentatious gains, has truthfulness become optional?
I understand that leaders must create economic
value. But pragmatism reveals a harder truth: The straight path doesn’t
always lead to profit. Sometimes markets shift. Sometimes ethics constrain.
Sometimes luck evaporates.
Yet in these moments—when spreadsheets bleed
red—we glimpse a leader’s soul.
Do they double down on integrity? Or chase
success through deception?
Do they dissect failures with humility? Or scapegoat subordinates?
The ancient Greeks understood what we’ve
forgotten. As Sophocles warned:
“Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.”
A leader’s legacy isn’t built on quarterly
earnings alone, but on the priceless currency of character:
·
The uprightness to
admit “This was my responsibility”
·
The humility to mine
wisdom from wreckage
·
The honor that turns
defeat into dignity
The CEO I witnessed saw a manager’s
“fruitlessness.”
I saw a leader who deserved something rarer than applause:
Respect for refusing to sell his soul.
Comments