*The Problem with Unnecessary Titles in Local Media Reporting
There are many quirks in local media that I can usually tolerate, but one recurring practice makes me uneasy: the excessive and often unnecessary use of personal or professional titles in news reports.
Take, for example, Mr. Bekele. He
may be a civil engineer by training but currently serves as a CEO of a company.
Yet, the media repeatedly refers to him as Engineer Bekele—"Engineer
Bekele said this and that..." This is superfluous. What matters to most
readers is that he is the CEO, an authoritative figure in the context of the
report. His educational background, unless directly relevant, is secondary at
best.
Firstly, his current role as CEO is
far more pertinent to the issue being discussed than his academic or
professional training. Secondly, "Engineer" is not a formal title
like Dr., Prof., Mr., or Rev. (A discussion I’ll save for another piece.) If
the aim of the news is to convey what the company thinks or what its leader has
said, why distract us with irrelevant or redundant titles?
In fact, using such titles can
sometimes be misleading or inappropriate. Many countries regulate title
usage—requiring official certification, like RN (Registered Nurse), or
restricting professional titles to those actively practicing in that field.
Now, consider the following common
examples from our local mainstream media:
- "Graphic Designer Eshete said..."
- "Farmer Gebre accepted..."
- "Dr. Engineer Semunigus affirmed..."
- "Artist Kebede stated..."
- "Architect Senedu contemplated..."
What’s next? "Social Media
Evangelist Belachew commanded..." or "Captain of Buzz Seble
said..."?
Well, I don't want to argue with some Gen Z who would like to call themselves like 'Tiktoker X or Y' if that is what they'd love to be called.
While I respect people’s preferences
for how they are addressed—whether personal or professional—I believe
journalistic professionalism calls for a focus on substance over form. The
story should center on what was said and why it matters, not on inflating the
speaker's title.
We can learn a lot from
international journalism in this regard. Consider global figures like Angela
Merkel, often described as the most powerful woman in the world and the de
facto leader of the EU. She holds a PhD, yet we rarely—if ever—hear her
referred to as "Dr. Merkel" in news reporting. The same goes for
Chinese President Xi Jinping or Iran's former President Hassan Rouhani—both of
whom have doctorates. Their titles are used only when their educational
background is central to the story.
In short, I see no compelling reason
for local media to overuse professional or educational titles, especially when
they add no value to the news being reported. In fact, I’ve grown increasingly
intolerant of this practice.
As always, I welcome your thoughts
on this topic. Have a great week!
Comments